On Mi, 21.12.22 12:22, Fedora Development ML (devel@lists.fedoraproject.org) wrote:
> On 20/12/2022 19:56, Chris Murphy wrote: > Great. The gotcha though > is this in effect requires a change in the file system currently > mounted at /boot, which is ext4. And ext4 isn't supported by sd-boot > or UEFI firmware. So if you're going to support sd-boot, the > installer needs to be aware that either the ESP is big enough to be > used as /boot, or if it's not big enough then it will be mounted on > /efi*and* a new partition XBOOTLDR formatted as FAT will be used as > /boot. > > Nobody should use FAT for /boot. efifs[1] should be used instead. I vehemently disagree. VFAT is the way to go. It's simply a pointless excercise to use anything else. https://0pointer.net/blog/linux-boot-partitions.html I think it might be OK to stick to ext4 for upgrades, but outside of that, for new installs it's something that really should be avoided I am sure. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Berlin _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
