On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 7:22 AM Neal Becker <ndbeck...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The one concern I have with this proposal is it says that flatpak version 
> would only be offered if it didn't duplicate a package in fedora.  The 
> potential problem I see is this depends on Fedora and Flathub being totally 
> consistent in their naming.

Flatpaks require RDNN naming (because AppStream does), which is often
part of the upstream source code already for AppStream data. So this
is *usually* not an issue.




--
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to