On Thu, 2024-05-02 at 15:41 -0400, Przemek Klosowski via devel wrote:
> On 5/2/24 14:34, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> > While I follow the philosophy of updating
> > regularly, there are likely some who install Fnn, and
> > never update, and then would expect an update to
> > Fnn+2 to work without issue(s).
> > --
> 
> The CLI update strongly suggests doing 'dnf update --refresh' before 
> system-upgrade. It doesn't require it though.
> 
> I always thought it's an odd workflow; why doesn't it just force it? 
> While it might take a long while to complete on a stale system, it's 
> recommended anyway, isn't it?

I would actually hugely prefer we amend that to say `dnf --refresh
offline-upgrade download; dnf offline-upgrade reboot` or so. It's a
footgun as it stands.
-- 
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org
https://www.happyassassin.net



--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to