Am 30.11.2015 um 18:58 schrieb Till Maas:
On Mo, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:28:57 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:Is there any reason not to use the date as the version? It's in YYYYMMDD format so there shouldn't be a upgrade path issue but this isn't explicitly covered in the packaging guidelines that I can find.If you make it as a post release from the latest regular release, you can easily adjust if they go back to normal releases without requiring an epoch
to make that clear
Version: <last-regular-release>
Release: YYYYMMDD.1%{?dist}
where the .1 is the typical usage of Release
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
