On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Till Maas <opensou...@till.name> wrote:
> On Mo, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:28:57 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > > > Is there any reason not to use the date as the version? It's in YYYYMMDD > > format so there shouldn't be a upgrade path issue but this isn't > explicitly > > covered in the packaging guidelines that I can find. > > If you make it as a post release from the latest regular release, you > can easily adjust if they go back to normal releases without requiring > an epoch. I agree that would work, but staying canonical with upstream, if they ask, "What version are you using?", 0.4.1 is not the correct answer. I think it would be different if I was doing actual checkouts but they provide archives which include the date. Thanks, Richard
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
