On Wed, 2018-10-24 at 14:42 +0200, Valentin Vidic wrote: > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 01:25:54PM +0100, Adam Spiers wrote: > > No doubt I've missed some pros and cons here. At this point > > personally I'm slightly leaning towards keeping them in the > > openstack-resource-agents - but that's assuming I can either hand > > off > > maintainership to someone with more time, or somehow find the time > > myself to do a better job. > > > > What does everyone else think? All opinions are very welcome, > > obviously. > > Well, I can just comment that with all the python agents coming in, > the resource-agents package is getting a bit heavy on the > dependencies > (at least in Debian) so we might decide to split it at some point in > the future. >
Do you mean additional python module dependencies, or that the dependency on python itself seems like added weight? Because since python is a dependency of pacemaker as well as both crmsh, pcs and fence-agents already, it really shouldn't make a difference. Cheers, Kristoffer _______________________________________________ Developers mailing list Developers@clusterlabs.org https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/developers