Kristoffer Grönlund <kgronl...@suse.de> wrote:
On Wed, 2018-10-24 at 13:25 +0100, Adam Spiers wrote:
[cross-posting to openstack-dev]
Oyvind Albrigtsen <oalbr...@redhat.com> wrote:
[snipped]
> - openstack-cinder-volume
> - openstack-floating-ip
> - openstack-info
That's an interesting development.
By popular demand from the community, in Oct 2015 the canonical
location for OpenStack-specific resource agents became:
https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/openstack-resource-agent
s/
as announced here:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-October/0
77601.html
Hi Adam,
I guess I did know that but it didn't cross my mind to question the
submission, apologies. What is the relationship of the submitter of
these openstack agents to the upstream project?
I don't know.
Are these agents copies
of your openstack agents, or completely separate developments?
Completely separate developments.
Ironically, it seems that he submitted a blueprint for this work
to openstack-resource-agents back in May, but somehow I totally
missed it:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack-resource-agents/+spec/resource-agents-consuming-openstack-api
Maybe the best solution would be if you could get in touch with the
submitter of these agents and see if you can join forces in maintaining
a single set of agents.
Isn't that what I just did, by cross-posting to both communities? ;-)
Unfortunately I don't have a direct email address I can Cc.
I guess this is an issue with maintaining agents outside the resource-
agents repository - the same goes for the two PostgreSQL agents in
existence. It's possible that people don't even realise that there
could be agents that are not maintained in the resource-agents
repository. :/ Maybe one solution would be to add documents in place of
the agents with links to their actual upstream.
Right. Discoverability is key.
_______________________________________________
Developers mailing list
Developers@clusterlabs.org
https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
