Very little. It is a fairly broadband 1:1 transformer at HF frequencies and
it forces the currents in the center conductor and shield to be equal.
The amount of power lost in such a choke balun is very small compared to
the power delivered to the load. See The ARRL Antenna Book 21, 26-21

73, de AA5J
At 06:02 PM 10/28/2007, Dave 'Doc' Corio wrote:

>     Hi, Chuck. Since that is just about the exact dimension for a 
> "choke balun" from the original Windom design, would it have any 
> effect on the impedance? I suppose I could just wrap it up and see 
> for myself, but thought I should at least be nice enoough to 
> respond, since you took the time to answer my post.
>
>Tnx!
>Dave KB3MOW
>
>
>Chuck Mayfield wrote:
>>
>>If it were my station, I would wrap it around a 3 to 4 inch form and
>>lay it behind the operating table. That would further limit RF noise
>>and would do no harm to SWR.
>>
>>Best regards,
>>Chuck Mayfield
>>
>>Neither a lofty degree of intelligence nor imagination nor both
>>together go to the making of genius. Love, love, love, that is the
>>soul of genius.
>>~ Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart
>>
>>At 11:45 AM 10/28/2007, Dave wrote:
>>
>> >Just put up a coax-fed Windom antenna and have about 15-20 feet of
>> >excess coax. I'd prefer to keep the overall length of the coax, just
>> >not sure if coiling it or laying it out flat would be better. I know
>> >the older Windoms needed a tight coil of coax near the antenna, but the
>> >1:1 balun in this one should negate that.
>> >
>> >Any ideas on which might be better?
>> >
>> >Tnx es 73
>> >Dave
>> >KB3MOW
>> >
>> >
>> >No virus found in this incoming message.
>> >Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> >Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1096 - Release Date:
>> >10/27/2007 11:02 AM
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>No virus found in this incoming message.
>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1097 - Release Date: 
>>10/28/2007 1:58 PM
>>
>
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1096 - Release Date: 
>10/27/2007 11:02 AM

Reply via email to