The flaw in your rhetoric, Jaak, is that Winlink PMBOs are QRMing existing
QSOs whether or not an emergency is in progress. No one has a problem with
this during an emergency -- but most of the time (thank goodness!) there is
no emergency, and we're being QRM'd for no rational reason. There is nothing
wrong with unattended stations, message passing, or using Pactor III -- but
there is a plenty wrong with failing to verify that the frequency is locally
clear before transmitting during non-emergency conditions.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-----Original Message-----
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Jaak Hohensee
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2007 5:40 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Humans tolerate robots!
Dear Rodney
You are wrong. You know laws/regulations, but ham-robots dont.
Ham-robots have strong mantra - emergency. And strong mission - helping
people.
What you and other ham-humans have against this rhetoric?
Ham-humans need better rhetoric against ham-robots. Like this:
Mantra for ham-humans: Ham bands robotfree! Robots act in ham-bands like
communication terrorists.
Ham-humans mission: To developing human communication skills for any case,
not only for emergency. For emergency better widely used QRP-readiness.
73, Jaak
ES1HJ/QRP
Rodney wrote:
Tolerant of what? Intentional interference? Don't think so!
Tolerant of blatant breaking of laws and regulations? NOT!
Jaak Hohensee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Demetre SV1UY wrote:
...This is supposed to be a free world but in a free world we should
always be a bit more tolerant, don't you think?
73 de Demetre SV1UY
New era beginning...
HNY 2008 from DigiQRP community.
--
Jaak Hohensee
ES1HJ/QRP
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
.
--
Jaak Hohensee
ES1HJ/QRP
