and the LATEST beta to the test team has a major surprise ! tease... On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 3:21 PM, John Bradley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > you know what Patrick? it works really, really well and can live with the > GUI however you want it. > > > > > > John > > VE5MU > > > > > > From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Patrick Lindecker > Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2008 1:59 PM > To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com > > > Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Keeping NBEMS in mind > > > > > > > > > > Hello John, > > > > > > >As far as FAE400 goes, I would like to try it. Too bad one > >can only get it from one source. (gee that kind of makes it > >just like pactor 3. > > > Pactor 2 and 3 have private detailed specifications which forbid to even > decode them (however it would be impossible to work them in ARQ with a PC) > whereas ARQ FAE has public specifications (on my WEB site). Any Ham, in > theory, could program ARQ FAE (but it's true that it would be a bit long as > they are over-specifications on ALE specifications). > > > > > > >I don't hear any anyone screaming bloody murder about that.) Multipsk may > be a very fine software package > >but the screen looks like crap. > > > > As written previously: > > > "You see it cluttered, I see it in perfect order. > > > > This GUI corresponds to what I need i.e.: > * not to waste time in searching the wished command or to switch of mode or > sub-mode > (minimum of menus, maximum of buttons, panel of modes...), > * always the maximum of information directly available on the screen (many > hints, > contextual help with right click, QRGs, actual configuration...)." > > > > > > I haven't any desire to change anything to this GUI. > > > > > > 73 > > > Patrick > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "John Becker, WØJAB" > > > To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com > > > Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2008 7:51 PM > > > Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Keeping NBEMS in mind > > > > > > After reading this thread with great intrust I still fail to see > the difference between it and what has been done with > the Pactor modes. That is other than being narrow. > I have copies Pactor that has to say the least been about > 2 DB under ESP. > > As far as FAE400 goes, I would like to try it. Too bad one > can only get it from one source. (gee that kind of makes it > just like pactor 3. I don't hear any anyone screaming bloody > murder about that.) Multipsk may be a very fine software package > but the screen looks like crap. Just way way to much un-needed > garbage there. Are you listing Patrick ? If it was my software > I think I would have a drop down window to pick the mode > of operation. And only what was needed for that mode would > be on that screen. > > Yeah I know - that's just my option. Everyone has one. And > I'm sitting on mine. > > John, W0JAB > in the center of fly over country > >
-- Andy K3UK www.obriensweb.com (QSL via N2RJ)
