Don
As one of the moderators of this list let you thank
you for you post stating what I really can't.

BTW - I did sent him a note saying that we really 
don't need the "screw you" comment.

John, W0JAB

At 09:04 PM 4/11/2008, you wrote:
>David WD4KPD,
>
>I guess the "bring it on" means you want a response. I noticed reading
>many of your replies that you leave these types of remarks below your
>name/call when you reply to message posts to get a point across for
>what ever reason so I can only assume by what you have listed before
>on other posts you want me to respond or as you say "bring it on".  
>
>I for one want to let you know that I did NOT provoke a response like
>you have given me but my post was in good and positive spirit of Ham
>Radio.  I also did NOT post the 30 Meter Digital QRP Weekend to be
>belittled by you or anyone else…you have voiced your opinion and I
>can't change that nor will I try but by you voicing it publicly you
>are trying to sway others in your views…they will have to decide what
>is right and wrong or what they agree or disagree with according to
>facts…so far the facts are not on the Internet but by listening to the
>great bunch of digital ops on the 30 Meter band that have no
>intentions of contesting on the 30 Meter band.   
>
>If you don't mind David I will answer your post publicly since you
>were so fast at responding to my message post that again didn't
>warrant such a reply you have given it but then again you have your
>own opinions so that is a right no one can take away and many have
>died for you to have that right here in the good old USA. 
>
>"for all intents and purposes, this non-contest is still a
>contest"…..Right from the start your reply message changes my message
>post from a 30 Meter Digital QRP Weekend to ANOTHER NON-CONTEST ON A
>NO CONTEST BAND is of a mean spirited nature and negative and I'm not
>sure why that is but that is your call (many times I just use my
>delete key if not intersted)....for those of you that do decide to
>work the 30 Meter Digital QRP Weekend on April 19/20 you are going to
>be very disappointed if you are looking for a contest.  All you are
>going to find is a bunch of really nice digital ops making casual
>contacts, experimenting with low power, long ragchews and DX if the
>band allows....you will NOT find is any rules on about a contest
>because there is no contest…no rules for exchange…no time limits…..no
>points….no logs are requested to be sent in for any contest prize for
>the weekend because there are none ….the only winners are those that
>participate and have fun.   
>
>"there is a sponsor"….a sponsor is one that spends money maybe on a
>contest or something and I guess would give out prizes for those
>winners and might gain something from all this.  Again we might be
>putting the word out to give 30 Meters a try and we do hope for more
>Hams to participate on the 30 Meter band so that is true (could care
>less if they join the 30MDG because our main focus or goal is to have
>an increase awareness and usage of digital modes on 30 Meters…if they
>join in 30MDG so be it but not our goal)…..having fun on Ham Radio is
>FREE and we don't spend any money on FREE fun…again there is no winner
>for the most contacts or having the most points on the QRP Weekend
>because again David there are no points, contest like exchanges or
>contact limits and good luck on having fast contacts because there is
>a nice bunch of long winded ragchew digital operators on the 30 Meter
>band so you will have a hard time getting to that next contact very
>quickly even if you wanted to.
>
>"and bragging rights are earned by contesters in the organization"….oh
>really?  I think bragging about how far a QRP signal may go or who
>hears your low power signal and maybe how many contacts you make using
>low power and to what areas of the World those contacts are made is
>what we do all the time, right?  You David post your MEPT reports and
>I don't think that is contesting on 30 Meters yet it is bragging of
>sorts and very informative (thanks for doing that by the way).   BTW,
>we are NOT an organization but a group of average `Joe" digital
>operators just having fun on the 30 Meter band.   I agree though there
>are some contesters in our group and some darn good ones, I understand
>you don't like contesting and that is fine and you have that right to
>not like it as I'm not much on contesting myself…but even though there
>are contesters in our group doesn't mean they are contesting on the 30
>Meter band in fact just the opposite as I think from reading the mail
>on many of them since 30 Meters is a WARC band and a NO CONTEST band
>they seems to like this place to come to and ragchew and get to know
>other Hams vs when on the other bands getting hammered by folks just
>needing a fast contact and 599 report to get them in the log and
>sometimes QRM'd to the degree they couldn't carry on a good ragchew if
>they wanted to.
>
>"it may be legal" ….yes it is legal to use the 30 Meter Band (we are
>secondary users…should give way to gov/com'l transmitions…also be kind
>to our neighbors in QSO with the modes we use..and follow the rules or
>our license), unless you are now in charge of the rule making David
>and we no longer can use the 30 Meter band or promote the use of the
>30 Meter band….I for one will be using the 30 Meter band.
>
>"but still in poor taste"…really?  What would you suggest David to
>promote the 30 Meter band?  I'm all ears and you can list all your
>ideas here or email me direct if you wish.   
>
>What I think is in poor taste is some of your replies to others here
>and your negativity so although you have the right to have your own
>opinions just don't be surprised if not everyone agrees with you yet
>the silent majority sit back and read all this but never reply because
>they already know how silly it all is yet the `squeaky wheel gets the
>oil'…although many of your posts are very informative and again I
>respect you but that is a two way street my friend. 
>
>So you have said your peace and although I don't agree with you you
>have the right to your views…I just don't agree with you but can still
>respect you (I think).
>
>I don't expect you to join in on the 30 Meter Digital QRP Weekend as
>you have made your views public and known (although if you listen in
>you are going to be very disappointed if you are a contester or
>expecting a contest on 30 Meters because there isn't one) and I don't
>really want to change your mind on your opinions as you have that
>right but as far as your `poor taste' and `bring it on' with in your
>reply to my simple posting of a 30 Meter event that I thought others
>that are digital operators might be interested in (this is a digital
>group right?) I would expect nothing less than an apology to me not
>for your opinions because again you have that right to disagree with
>anything you like or that you disagree that it is a contest (which it
>isn't but again you have the right to your views) but an apology for
>your `poor taste' in a response that only would provoke a `bring it
>on' response back to you.
>
>BTW, I have read some of your posts and never replied but could have…I
>don't agree with you starting a message post as "SCREW" this or
>that….or "intentional QRM"…yet I sit and read but I feel many times
>things are better left unsaid (wish this was one of them but again you
>asked) and let others be the judge and jury and just try to enjoy what
>time I have in this great hobby we have.
>
>I will be promoting the use of the digital modes on the 30 Meter Band
>and at most post a message post here once a month at the very most to
>let other digital operators know of these 30 Meter events…that is of
>course unless this really isn't a Ham Radio Digital Yahoo Group or
>Andy thinks otherwise...ask anyone that knows me or google me, I'm a
>straight shooter and call it the way I see it if asked…you asked so
>thanks for letting me respond.
>
>De kb9umt Don 
>www.30meterdigital.org
>
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/message/20283
>
>intentional QRM
>
>
>for all intents and purposes, when "Winlink" transmits
>into the blind on a shared channel, that is intentional QRM. so by
>doing so, they are advocating QRMing others just as i suggested.
>
>i agree that my language was a bit overboard, and apparently in poor
>Spirit, but please don't point me out as the sole abuser.
>
>i promise Andy, this will be my last on this issue.
>
>david/wd4kpd
>
>
>
>
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/message/20260
>
>screw WINLINK
>
>"Live with it, and get used to it"
>then QRM it.
>
>david/wd4kpd
>
>
>Re: [digitalradio] screw WINLINK
>
>Just a friendly reminder that a rule of this group is that we adhere
>to normal operational rules and not advocate deliberate interference.
>Andy K3UK
>
>On 3/9/07, David Michael Gaytko // WD4KPD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>    "Live with it, and get used to it"
>    then QRM it.
>
>    david/wd4kpd
>
>
>
>
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/message/17951
>
>CHAOS
>
>since CW is ok anywhere in the band, perhaps all the cw ops might
>abandon the (gonna be crowded for sure) special cw area down low
>and simply stake out an area in the lower ssb area.
>this would give the digi folks a bit more room free from qrm. not
>to knock cw, but enough cw operations would drive any ssb away.
>
>david/wd4kpd
>
>anarchy and chaos always win !
>
>
>--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, David Michael Gaytko // WD4KPD
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> 30 Meter QRP Weekend April 19th & 20th
>> 
>> 10.140        +/- 1000 PSK
>> (10.135 ­ 10.145 ­ HELL,OLIVIA,RTTY,Etc)
>> 
>> 
>> for all intents and purposes, this non-contest is still a contest.
>> there is a sponsor, and bragging rights are earned by the contesters
>> in the organization.
>> 
>> it may be legal, but still in poor taste.
>> 
>> david/wd4kpd
>> 
>> "bring it on"
>>
>
>
>
>
>--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, David Michael Gaytko // WD4KPD
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> 30 Meter QRP Weekend April 19th & 20th
>> 
>> 10.140        +/- 1000 PSK
>> (10.135 ­ 10.145 ­ HELL,OLIVIA,RTTY,Etc)
>> 
>> 
>> for all intents and purposes, this non-contest is still a contest.
>> there is a sponsor, and bragging rights are earned by the contesters
>> in the organization.
>> 
>> it may be legal, but still in poor taste.
>> 
>> david/wd4kpd
>> 
>> "bring it on"
>>
>
>
>
>------------------------------------
>
>Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at
>http://www.obriensweb.com/sked
>
>Check our other Yahoo Groups....
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dxlist/
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/contesting
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

Reply via email to