Patrick,
I failed to point that every combination of bandwidth -125, 250,
500,1000, 2000, and tones - 2,4,8,16,32,64, 128, 256, for Contestia and
Olivia are ALREADY implemented in both Fldigi and MixW. It is only
because of this that were were able to discover the benefits of
Contestia 64/2000 and 32/2000 which are not yet supported in Multipsk.
By copy of this email, I am formally requesting Dave, W1HKJ, to request
RD ID numbers for all these combinations, as it is just not possible to
guess which combination will prove to be very useful under certain
conditions. It took us weeks of daily tests to find out that Contestia
64/1000 is the MOST dependable mode to use for digital QSO's on UHF
because of the extreme conditions there.
73 - Skip KH6TY
Patrick Lindecker wrote:
Skip,
It is an informal group composed by the Hams able to program RS ID in
their own respective programs (i.e Votjech, Simon, Dave, Cesco and
myself).
A RS ID number can't be virtual. It must be really implemented in a
program...
73
Patrick
----- Original Message -----
*From:* KH6TY <mailto:kh...@comcast.net>
*To:* digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:digitalradio@yahoogroups.com>
*Sent:* Monday, May 10, 2010 10:04 PM
*Subject:* Re: [digitalradio] Contestia 250 - new concept for usage
Hi Patrick,
Yahoo reports there is no RSID group. Where should I request
additional RSID codes?
73 - Skip KH6TY
Patrick Lindecker wrote:
Hello Skip,
About Contestia:
I think this mode is a better compromise between robustness and
speed than Olivia (too much robustness) and RTTYM (very fast but
with the problem of having two sets of characters as in RTTY, i.e
letters and figures, and hence much risk of packet of errors).
>but it would be helpful if Patrick would assign Reed Solomon
Identifiers to include those variants.
RR for all, but I have not seen demands to our RS ID group...
