I encountered a opendmarc bug that required adsp records as well to send dmarc reports and i had a fun time trying to reproduce the output for i do not know how long the url i mention will last.
a webparser at www.winserver.com/public/wcadsp/default.wct which produces example.com main domain and example.net in asl _adsp._domainkey.example.com IN TXT "dkim=all; atps=y; asl=example.net;" YFP5HEI6FUVG5WMNRBCEO6BK2Z75XKJZ._atps.example.com IN TXT "v=atps01; d= example.net;" Which i think is what i need but opendkim-atpszone -h sha1 -u example.com -A example.net -vvv opendkim-atpszone: database opened server xxx zone example.com update add YFP5HEI6FUVG5WMNRBCEO6BK2Z75XKJZ._atps TXT 86400 "v=ATPS1; d= example.net" send answer opendkim-atpszone: 1 record written Is nearly the same but I am confused - is the web parser right and the opendkim-atpszone command wrong? with v=ATPS1 YFP5HEI6FUVG5WMNRBCEO6BK2Z75XKJZ._atps.example.com IN TXT "v=atps01; YFP5HEI6FUVG5WMNRBCEO6BK2Z75XKJZ._atps TXT 86400 "v=ATPS1; I ask as this affects only dmarc reports (no i do not run example.com) our normal email is sent ok It is close but who is right ?. I ask as this is not terribly clear. - as long as i have a sha1 hash of whatever YFP5HEI6FUVG5WMNRBCEO6BK2Z75XKJZ translates and can work around opendkim-atpszone i think i am good.
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
