In article <5bbf9b2b.6010...@signal100.com> you write: >Other than rewriting headers (which of course can be done in a number of >ways), what would you suggest? > >Perhaps a new RFC defining new headers which MLs can add to describe to >mail clients exactly what has been done? This was suggested before but >itself has drawbacks.
It's easy enough to invent hacks that lists could apply and MUAs could undo, but the chances of MUAs all implementing them is even less than of a critical mass of MTAs implementing ARC. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
