My dmarc = v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rep...@bexx.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_foren...@bexx.com; fo=1
Is this incorrect? Thanks all Paul > On Jun 21, 2020, at 12:48 PM, John Levine via dmarc-discuss > <dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote: > > In article <2e056b35-f783-dccb-b319-31c35d002...@dcrocker.net>, > Dave Crocker via dmarc-discuss <d...@dcrocker.net> wrote: >> On 6/21/2020 7:57 AM, Matthäus Wander via dmarc-discuss wrote: >>> This sounds like the recipient is forwarding emails to Gmail. The DKIM >>> signature is valid because it originates from your server. >> >> Only if the forwarding process makes no changes that break the DKIM >> signature. In theory, that's easy. In practice, it's a very narrow >> category of forwarding behaviors that accomplish this. > > It's narrow but it's pretty common these days for people to forward > their mail from other places to gmail. A lot of my users do it. > > Unfortunately I have found a dismaying number of places, particularly > in the US goverment, publish DMARC p=reject and only use SPF, > presumably because there's an official rule that they must do DMARC > and this lets them check the box without doing any work. Needless to > say, the forwards fail and I've walked most of them through the > process to pull rather than push, configuring Gmail to pick up the > mail from their local mailbox with POP. > > -- > Regards, > John Levine, jo...@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for > Dummies", > Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc-discuss mailing list > dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org > http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss > > NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms > (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
