> > > It appears that DW_LNAME_HIP, proposed in 230120.4, never got > incorporated into the DWARF working document (so there is no duplication). > Perhaps because the Issue status is "Code Assigned" rather than Approved. > That status really only applies to the V5 code assignment actually. >
I've been following Michael's protocol of using the status "Language Code Assigned" for new language codes, where no committee discussion is necessary. Would it help your process if I added the word "Accepted" to the issue status? -cary
-- Dwarf-discuss mailing list Dwarf-discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org https://lists.dwarfstd.org/mailman/listinfo/dwarf-discuss
