> > > >DW_LANG_HIP/DW_LNAME_HIP was assigned first, but for some reason, the > list was out of order, so when I assigned >DW_LNAME_Assembly, it looked > like 0x001c was the last code assigned. I think it would be safer to > reassign >DW_LNAME_Assembly as 0x0029. > > I think it would be safer to just leave well-enough alone. I just updated > the document to match the website (and make DW_LNAME_HIP = 0x0029). So any > change causes work for me. Similarly it creates work for anyone who is > actually trying to use code DW_LNAME_Assembly. Why bother? >
Looks like DW_LNAME_HIP never made it into the document after it was approved. Given the timing, it would make a little more sense to renumber Assembly instead, but since that's already in the document, and HIP isn't, I'll renumber HIP. Since this affects the DWARF 6 language codes only, we shouldn't have to worry about affecting anyone. Heads up, though: if anyone has started using DW_LNAME_HIP, please be aware of this change! I've added this as Issue 240423.1 <https://dwarfstd.org/issues/240423.1.html>. -cary
-- Dwarf-discuss mailing list Dwarf-discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org https://lists.dwarfstd.org/mailman/listinfo/dwarf-discuss
