On 01/05/2016 10:36 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 12/23/2015 10:57 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: >>> I'm trying to build the ppc64le branch of OpenBLAS on EPEL7. But, I get the >>> following error message in the setup phase: >>> >>> DEBUG util.py:393: Error: No Package found for /usr/bin/execstack >>> >>> Why would this binary not exist on ppc64le? >> >> Because originally it was part of prelink, which was never supported >> on aarch64/ppc64le, in RHEL it's shipped as part of that package, it >> was dropped in F-23 and the useful execstack binary was split out into >> it's own package. It shouldn't be built in EPEL as it'll conflict with >> core RHEL packages. >> >> Peter > > But perhaps we could do > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL:Packaging#Limited_Arch_Packages > > add ppc64le to the list of ExclusiveArch, and only ship execstack? > See http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12421692 > > Or perhaps we could just go ahead an ship execstack with a Conflicts: prelink. > Not sure it's that big of a deal.
Perhaps even ExclusiveArch the EPEL7 execstack package? -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
