On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 8:12 PM Orion Poplawski <or...@nwra.com> wrote:
> While working on EPEL9, it seems that even more packages are missing > from RHEL9 than were in RHEL8. The latest I found was cppunit, which > appears to be completely missing from the CS9 repos despite having been > built (See > https://kojihub.stream.centos.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=2414) and > presumably in the CS9/RHEL9 buildroot. > > So I scraped some screens from pkgs.org: > > Stream 9: > > CentOS AppStream Official x86_64 8882 > CentOS BaseOS Official x86_64 2357 > CentOS CRB Official x86_64 1856 > > Stream 8: > > CentOS AppStream Official x86_64 15008 > CentOS BaseOS Official x86_64 6721 > CentOS PowerTools Official x86_64 3771 > > Sorry, but those numbers are wrong for a comparison. There are not 15,000 unique packages in AppStream, not even close. What I believe you, or they, are counting is the total number of packages released. So, if the kernel has been released 15 times since Stream 8 started, then it's counted as 15. Because of that, it's natural for the numbers to be bigger, because Stream 8 has been out longer. If you want the numbers, I can get them. Last time I checked, RHEL9 was very close to the same number of packages as RHEL8. It was more, but very close to the same number. Troy
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
