Hey,
not sure how you can survive with superserver :)
I can't see that working with our kind of load (realtime-data-processing, 
reports, mostly write IOPS)
It's a long time ago (Fb 1.5) since we used superserver but we didn't have the 
best time with it back then.

But currently this is not about switching the server-version. More about 
undestanding why the server is not using the provided hardware :)

Also it reads kinda strange if you talk about high load, but always have low 
cpu usage :)
 

---In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, <liviuslivius@...> wrote :

 Hi,
  
 just curious – why not superserver?
 I do not know what your system do and if it is cpu intensive –
 but i always use superserver because of big cache and this is for me biggest 
speed up.
 I use superserver in environment with ~400 connections (near constant) and 
high load without problem.
  
 PS. i wait for FB3.0 and all my servers will gain another speed up because of 
multicore use.
 But i have always low cpu usage also in high load system – and i do not know 
why you can got 80% CPU load – maybe this is some issue or some “weekness” of 
classic?
  
 regards,
 Karol Bieniaszewski
  
 From: mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Monday, April 11, 2016 2:55 PM
 To: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [firebird-support] [FB 2.1] Firebird engine seems to slow down on 
high load without utilizing hardware


  

   
 hi,
 recently we had some strange performance issues with our Firebird DB server.
 On high load, our server started to slow down. Select and update SQL query 
times did go up by more than 500% on average,
 but reaching unreasonable high execution times at worst case. (several minutes 
instead of < 1sec)
  
 OIT/OAT/Next Transaction statistics was within 1000 the hole time
 We were not able to messure any hardware limiting factor. Indeed, this system 
was running with only 8 cores at about 70% CPU usage on max. load.
 We decided that this may be our problem since we experienced a similar problem 
at about 80% CPU load in the past.
 So we upgraded the hardware. As expected, the CPU-load dropped to ~35% usage 
on max. load scenario.
 But this did not solve the problem.
 Same story for the harddisk system. The usage is not even near it's max 
capacity.
  
 We also can't see any impact on the harddisk.
< p>We'r kind of stuck with our ideas, because we have no idea what could be a 
potential bottleneck to the system. Since the hardware doesn't show a limit, 
there have to be anything else - most likely firebird engine related that's 
limiting our system.
 We would be very grateful if anyone can give us hints where we can search 
further.
 Or someone has similar experiences to share with us.
  
  
 Operating System: Windows Server 2003
 Firebird: 2.1.5 Classic
 Dedicated database server (VMWare)
  
 CPU: 16 cores, each 2.4 GHz
 RAM: 32 GB
 About 14GB are used from OS and firebird processes under max load.
 
 HDD: SAN Storage System
  
 Average system IOPS under load read: 100
 Average system IOPS under load write: 550
 Backup Restore IOPS read: 1700
 Backup Restore IOPS write: 250
 SAN IPOS Limit (max): 3000
  
 Firebird Config Settings, based on defaults
 DefaultDbCachePages = 1024
 LockMemSize = 134247728
 LockHashSlots = 20011
 
 Database
 size: about 45 GB
 450 to 550 concurrent connections
 Daily average of 65 transactions / second (peak should be higher)
  
 FB_LOCK_PRINT (without any params) while system was slowing down (~4 days 
uptime).
 I have to note, Firebird was not able to print the complete output (stats was 
not cropped by me)
  
 LOCK_HEADER BLOCK
 Version: 16, Active owner:      0, Length: 134247728, Used: 82169316
 Semmask: 0x0, Flags: 0x0001
 Enqs: 4211018659, Converts: 10050437, Rejects: 9115488, Blocks: 105409192
 Deadlock scans:   1049, Deadlocks:      0, Scan interval:  10
 Acquires: 4723416170, A cquire blocks: 640857597, Spin count:   0
 Mutex wait: 13.6%
 Hash slots: 15077, Hash lengths (min/avg/max):    3/  12/  25
 Remove node:      0, Insert queue:     36, Insert prior: 74815332
 Owners (456): forward: 131316, backward: 14899392
 Free owners (9): forward: 39711576, backward: 49867232
 Free locks (42409): forward: 65924212, backward: 23319052
  
 
 With best Regards,
  
 Patrick Friessnegg
 Synesc GmbH






        • ... thetr...@yahoo.com [firebird-support]
          • ... Alexey Kovyazin (ak) a...@ib-aid.com [firebird-support]
  • Re: [firebir... Mark Rotteveel m...@lawinegevaar.nl [firebird-support]
  • Re: [firebir... Alexey Kovyazin a...@ib-aid.com [firebird-support]
    • Re: [fi... 'Thomas Steinmaurer' t...@iblogmanager.com [firebird-support]
      • Re:... Alexey Kovyazin a...@ib-aid.com [firebird-support]
        • ... 'Thomas Steinmaurer' t...@iblogmanager.com [firebird-support]
    • [firebi... thetr...@yahoo.com [firebird-support]
      • [fi... Alexey Kovyazin (ak) a...@ib-aid.com [firebird-support]
  • Re: [firebir... liviusliv...@poczta.onet.pl [firebird-support]
    • Re: [fi... thetr...@yahoo.com [firebird-support]
  • [firebird-su... thetr...@yahoo.com [firebird-support]

Reply via email to