J.Pietschmann wrote:
Well, the functionality can be nearly emulated with standard XSLFO, even though it is somewhat messy, and perhaps some unwanted space appears.
How? Karen is about table header/footer, not static content.
I'd like to encapsulate both cases under one root, to keep things together, e.g.:A more generalized functionality would be FO which are conditionally rendered before/after page breaks in the FO which they are attached to: <fo:block> <fox:before-page-break> <fo:block>Continued on next page<fo:block> </fox:before-page-break> <fox:after-page-break> <fo:block>Continued from previouss page<fo:block> </fox:after-page-break> bla bla bla...
<fox:break-label>
<fox:before-page-break>
<fo:block>Continued on next page<fo:block>
</fox:before-page-break>
<fox:after-page-break>
<fo:block>Continued from previouss page<fo:block>
</fox:after-page-break>
</fox:break-label>
And that's allowed only in table header/footer content, right?
Because there is now an EXSLFO initiative, I think we should supply a draft spec there and wait for some consensus before making comminments to the FOP code base (unless asked for proof-of-concept or something). I'll take care if writing the spec and submitting it, right after I've cleaned the backlog.
Yes, please. -- Oleg Tkachenko eXperanto team Multiconn Technologies, Israel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]