Jeremias, I am wrong here. This phrase in 5.3.2:
"If the corresponding absolute "margin" property is specified on the formatting object..." Clearly means that margin *is* a CP, and hence is a CP with start-indent/end-indent as appropriate. Forget that argument--never mind, and I'm sorry that you had to waste time explaining this to me. I may have more questions on your logic though, as I'm studying your original response to Luca. But thankfully we're in agreement on this point. Thanks, Glen --- Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In mid January Peter helped me understand what's > going on. Please have a > look at his explanation [1]. Maybe that makes it > clearer. The margin > properties are never used directly in the layout > engine (I think and > hope). I'm always working from *-indent and space-*. > I think it's > obvious enough from 5.3.2 that *-indent and margin > are meant to be corresponding, > at least through the rules established therein. > > Actually, I think 5.1.2 is the section I should have > looked at before > Peter pointed out my mistake. About corresponding > properties it says > "The simplest example of such properties...", so in > my view 5.3.2 > describes a complex relationship and so my calling > these properties > corresponding was really correct. And the rules in > 5.3.2 talk about > corresponding ("margin-corresponding"), and to what > can they correspond > to if not start-indent and end-indent or > space-before and space-after > depending on the writing mode? > > If you think the current interpretation is wrong, > please present your > theory. However, the more I think about this, and > the more I'm > explaining, the more I can say that I'm sure that > the interpretation is > correct. > > [1] > http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgId=2078791