On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Robert Watson <rwat...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, sean connolly wrote: > >> Automatic reporting would end up being a mess given that panics can be >> caused by hardware problems. Having an autoreport check if memtest was run >> before it reports, or having it only run with -CURRENTmight be useful.
I too, disagree with this. Surely most attention would be given to the most often recurring problems across varied hardware. If a new -RELEASE is tagged and suddenly there is an influx of very similar automated crash reports across a wide selection of hardware, some conclusions can be reached. - Sincerely, Dan Naumov _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"