On Wednesday 07 April 2010 11:13:13 Fbsd1 wrote: > Polytropon wrote: > > On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 15:24:51 +0800, Fbsd1 <fb...@a1poweruser.com> wrote: > >> Why are there RELEASE base files in /usr/bin. I thought /usr was to only > >> contain binaries installed from ports or packages. > > > > No. The /usr/local subtree (LOCAL) is for local additions (ports > > and packages), while things outside this structure usually belong > > to the system itself; I'm excluding mounted filesystem and other > > things here for a moment. [snip] > > But that is not true. The postfix port populates /usr/bin.
I haven't installed postfix, but is this possibly related to the recently (2010-03-22) added option to install postfix into the base? In which case the commit six days later claims to correct a problem with the default (non-base) install. Jonathan _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
