On 11/4/10 1:29 AM, Polytropon wrote:
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 21:51:04 -0500, Ryan Coleman<ryan.cole...@cwis.biz> wrote:
He likely won't. This was pointed out to him two months ago
and nothing's been fixed.
Seems to be fine from here:
% nslookup -type=any thought.org
Server: 192.168.100.1
Address: 192.168.100.1#53
Non-authoritative answer:
thought.org mail exchanger = 10 ethic.thought.org.
thought.org nameserver = ns2.everydns.net.
thought.org nameserver = ns1.thought.org.
Authoritative answers can be found from:
% host ethic.thought.org
ethic.thought.org has address 209.180.213.210
% host ns1.thought.org
ns1.thought.org has address 209.180.213.210
% host ns2.everydns.net
ns2.everydns.net has address 208.76.62.100
% ping -c 3 ns2.everydns.net
PING ns2.everydns.net (208.76.62.100): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 208.76.62.100: icmp_seq=0 ttl=54 time=107.684 ms
64 bytes from 208.76.62.100: icmp_seq=1 ttl=54 time=107.073 ms
64 bytes from 208.76.62.100: icmp_seq=2 ttl=54 time=107.046 ms
--- ns2.everydns.net ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 107.046/107.268/107.684/0.295 ms
Or am I misreading that?
You're overlooking the fact that ns2.everydns.net refuses to respond to
queries about thought.org, though it is happy to respond to queries
about everydns.net. When half the servers for your zone refuse to
answer, things work less than 100%. On the other hand, I don't think
things are completely broken. Actually they're less broken than Gary's
DNS frequently is; it gets discussed on a regular basis for a reason.
So is the last octet of ns1.thought.org's address 209 or 210? ;-)
--
--Jon Radel
j...@radel.com
Consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds.
