On 20.06.2012 13:45, Jakub Lach wrote:
Really, this format of discussion is rather exception
than rule (from my experience).
Nothing wrong with productive flaming for me,
but it's just not typical code of conduct in FreeBSD
mailing list at all.
Actually I can't remember any flame-war about system compilers - this is
the first one.
But I believe it is a good proof, that clang is a serious alternative to
gcc - else people would talk about "an interesting project" or something
like that.
Greetings
Peter.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Why-Clang-tp5715861p5720039.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
