On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Marc Manthey <m...@let.de> wrote: >>> We can do it like Facebook. Everybody friends your profile >>> and you manually group them. The grouping is private in that >>> your friends don't know what groups they're in (and most of >>> the time, even if they've been grouped at all). >> >> At the time you "friend" (connect) a profile instead of "Accept" you must >> choose a relationship(s) (sibling, parent, etc.) or "Ignore". The same as >> facebook this relationship selection remains private. These relationships >> can be based on XFN(1). This minimises leaking and optimises privacy based >> on relationships. > > yep, thats exactly the same google + does (circles ) > > >>> We can do it like Diaspora. Explicit groups where the >>> interface requires that you group people and is public about >>> which groups you're interacting with when. >> >> I haven't explore Diaspora because I thought it was alpha software. > > Well it is same with http://project.friendika.com , but worth to have a > look at. > I'm running a Friendika server, and it appears to be relatively solid (and IMHO certainly easier to install than Diaspora). The Friendika protocol is documented and in the public domain; http://info.dfrn.org/ and http://dfrn.org/dfrn2.pdf
>>> Another approach is to use URLs. Give all your friends the >>> http://fbox.example.com/wild-and-crazy-guy address. Give >>> your family the http://fbox.example.com/pious-father address. >>> Give your coworkers the >>> http://fbox.example.com/always-at-my-desk address. Each of >>> these are just different views of the same profile. And then >>> you could manually change what people see if somebody's >>> status changes from, say, /boyfriend to /ex-boyfriend. > > Exactly, thats what i am talking about !!! +1 > >>> >>> The interface should be obvious about which groups you are talking to. >>> Perhaps the css could change in obvious ways (backrgound >>> color?) or perhaps the software could be smart enough to know >>> you don't want to share "me-drunk.png" with the group labelled "WORK" >> >> I think change of colour is important for mixed groups, e.g. you have >> people >> in a group with different relationships and no mutual relationships. > > Done in google + IMHO > > check this paper guys, we dont need to reinvent the wheel > > A Hybrid P2P/Infrastructure Platform for Personal and Social Internet > Services > http://research.nokia.com/files/pimrc08-camera.pdf > > greetings > > marc > > > -- Les enfants teribbles - research / deployment > Marc Manthey- Vogelsangerstrasse 97 > 50823 Köln - Germany > Tel.:0049-221-29891489 > Mobil:0049-1577-3329231 > blog: http://let.de > twitter: http://twitter.com/macbroadcast/ > facebook : http://opencu.tk > > > _______________________________________________ > Freedombox-discuss mailing list > Freedombox-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss > _______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list Freedombox-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss