On 11/13/10 05:28, Miles Bader wrote: > Behdad Esfahbod <beh...@behdad.org> writes: >> Interesting. I had totally forgotten about libotf. I hope now that new >> harfbuzz is in a usable state Kenichi abandons the libotf and helps >> with harfbuzz. > > Do they do the same thing? From the description it sounds like libotf > is much smaller and more focused, and might be more appropriate for > someone that only wants to get file info (which seems to have been the > case for the original poster on this thread).
HarfBuzz does everything that libotf does and much more. And is less than twice the size (70kb vs 120kb). The libotf-like API is in hb-ot.h. > Maybe you're thinking of libm17n; that looks closer to harfbuzz in > functionality. That too. > [BTW, is harfbuzz actually used anywhere yet? I can't seem to find it > in Debian...] We have not made tarball releases yet because 1. it's changing fast and 2. the API is not stable yet. But we plan to reach a stable 1.0 before March. Firefox 4 betas ship with HarfBuzz included. And the harfbuzz-ng-external branch of Pango moves forward with the master branch of harfbuzz. behdad > -Miles > _______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel