On 11/16/10 22:47, Kenichi Handa wrote: > I too want to switch from libotf to harfbuzz, but at the > moment, harfbuzz is not released as an independent library > (and APIs are still changing), I can't catch a good timing > to shift to harfbuzz.
Good to know. >>> Maybe you're thinking of libm17n; that looks closer to harfbuzz in >>> functionality. > >> That too. > > I really hope to use libm17n's shaping engine from harfbuzz. > A few years ago, I asked you to include libm17n-based > shaping module in Pango, but there have been no progress, > perhaps because Pango is going to use harfbuzz's shaping > engines, right? And, when I checked harfbuzz code a while > ago, it seems that shaping engines are builtin (i.e. not by > loadable modules). Don't you have a plan of making it > possible that harfbuzz can use the other loadable shaping > engine? For HarfBuzz, I do plan to support other backends. The final design will perhaps be a bit different, but it will be coming. behdad _______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel