On 11/24/12 05:03, Mason Loring Bliss wrote: > An amusing comparison may be drawn between the FSF's rejection of > four-clause BSD licenses and the FSF's support of invariant sections > in the GFDL.
Documentation is not software. I wouldn't be surprised to find differences when comparing licenses drawn for software to licenses drawn for documentation. Software freedom guidelines have nothing to do with documentation freedom. Applying one to the other shows profound lack of thought and is going to waste a lot of time. _______________________________________________ Fsf-collab-discuss mailing list Fsf-collab-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/fsf-collab-discuss
