I've done this. The link is both degrading and defamatory. Absent
repeated problems semi-protection is not justified but can be if such
postings are repeated.

Fred

> Adding semiprotection might help, too.
> Andreas
>
> --- On Wed, 31/8/11, Sarah <slimvir...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Sarah <slimvir...@gmail.com>
> Subject: [Gendergap] Oversight request
> To: "Increasing female participation in Wikimedia projects"
> <gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org>
> Date: Wednesday, 31 August, 2011, 17:23
>
> If there are oversighters on this list (Fred?), I'd appreciate an
> oversight at [[Jessica Valenti], where an anon (58.175.246.206) has
> linked to an attack site about her.
> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jessica_Valenti&action=history
>
> I've edited the article a lot myself so I'd prefer not to admin-delete
> it, and oversight would be better anyway. I've emailed the oversight
> team, but no response yet.
>
> Sarah
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gendergap mailing list
> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
> _______________________________________________
> Gendergap mailing list
> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>



_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

Reply via email to