On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 22:22, John Vandenberg <jay...@gmail.com> wrote: > As Sarah Stierch points out, our images of sexuality and reproduction > are crap, broadly speaking, and our paperwork/processes are > self-evidently not good for attracting high quality photographs. What > processes should we put in place to encourage good quality photographs > of this kind. e.g. should we set up a separate OTRS queue to process > the paperwork for these photographs? Should it be managed by > verified non-anonymous women only? > This last point is an excellent suggestion. Lots of people would be rightly reluctant to email a completely anonymous email address, read by lots of people, about such a sensitive issue. If there were a dedicated address, where the complaint would be read and handled only by other women, that could make a huge difference.
Sarah _______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
