I doubt that the comments issue is even a gender thing. Comment sections are pretty non-discriminatory in regards to starting up drama.
From, Emily On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 10:01 PM, Sarah Stierch <sarah.stie...@gmail.com> wrote: > Never read the comments. Never . > On Jul 8, 2014 6:50 PM, "Keilana" <keilanaw...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> If only, Tom. I would be shocked if that ever got removed. >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 6:15 AM, Tom Morris <t...@tommorris.org> wrote: >> >>> That’s really cool. >>> >>> (Just don’t read the comments. Awful misogyny contained therein. Is >>> there any way we can get that crap removed?) >>> >>> -- >>> Tom Morris >>> <http://tommorris.org/> >>> >>> >>> ----- Original message ----- >>> From: Jane Darnell <jane...@gmail.com> >>> To: Increasing female participation in Wikimedia projects >>> <gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org> >>> Subject: [Gendergap] Adrienne Wadewitz featured in short piece about >>> Gendergap on the English Wikipedia >>> Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2014 12:54:55 +0200 >>> >>> In case you missed it, the Signpost this week gives a link to this: >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TP8QCG7keQw >>> _________________________________________________ >>> Gendergap mailing list >>> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Gendergap mailing list >>> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gendergap mailing list >> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Gendergap mailing list > Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap > >
_______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
