If Arbcom members actually posted information which could be considered "outing" in violation of WMF policies, please take that information to the Ombudsmen Commission. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Ombudsman_commission
Pine On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 11:47 PM, Neotarf <neot...@gmail.com> wrote: > The arbitration committee has never responded to any of my emails, > although some individual arbitrators were willing to communicate with me > while I was writing the arbitration report for the Signpost. Would you > like screenshots of the bounce notifications? In addition, four > arbitrators posted personally identifying information about me and did not > respond to my requests to remove it. > > On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 2:05 AM, JJ Marr <jjm...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> "I emailed the WMF in relation to my enwiki arbcom case" >> >> You're getting ignored because the WMF doesn't want to get involved in >> community processes. Sorry to be blunt, but you should try emailing ArbCom >> before making this type of posting. >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committe >> e/Procedures#Standard_provision:_appeals_and_modifications >> >> >> >> >> On 09 Jul 2017 1:47 AM, "Neotarf" <neot...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hello, this is to let everyone know that I have submitted an appeal to >> the GGTF case. >> >> It has been very difficult to try to respond to the accusations in this >> arbitration case, because I don't understand them. Everyone who has looked >> at the diffs has found nothing. Kevin Gorman called them "flimsy". Even >> Wikipediocracy, which has no particular love for me, could find nothing. >> After having had time to go through some of the histories, I found that >> half of the diffs were from someone who wrote a program specifically to >> collect diffs of my edits in order to sift through them and who was able to >> use the program to discover IP addresses as well. The other half of the >> diffs were added to the case by one of the arbitrators after the evidence >> phase of the case had closed and included edits made by Jimmy Wales and one >> of the admins--not even my edits. I don't want to say a lot about this on >> a public mailing list, but at this point it is pretty obvious that this is >> a false conviction. >> >> I understand I was eligible to appeal this after one year, however I have >> waited more than two years. My initial inquiry to the WMF was on 11/17/16. >> I was assigned a member of the WMF staff and told I could expect to hear >> something in mid-January. Since then, I have made three followup queries, >> asking for an update to the expected timeline, but have been unable to get >> any response at all. At this point, there is no reason to believe the >> non-response is not deliberate. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gendergap mailing list >> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org >> To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please >> visit: >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gendergap mailing list >> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org >> To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please >> visit: >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Gendergap mailing list > Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org > To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please > visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap >
_______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
