No, that's exactly the opposite of what was said. I did not say I signed a non-disparagement agreement. I said I signed the standard WMF confidentiality agreement.
You can read it here: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Confidentiality_ agreement_for_nonpublic_information/ Everyone signs it for even mundane things. I first signed it when I processed free database accounts for The Wikipedia Library and had access to names and email addresses of editors. You can see there's nothing in it about non-disparagement. I feel quite free to disparage any person or institution that I choose. Given that you are unable to distinguish between a routine confidentiality agreement and a non-disparagement agreement, or between normal criticism and the suppression of discussion, I'm pretty confident that these alleged NPAs have never existed. The idea that Risker "wants to suppress all discussion" of these alleged NPAs is nonsense. She merely pointed out, quite correctly, that spreading baseless allegations is quite damaging to the very causes you profess to care about. Please consider that before you continue to double down on a baseless allegation. There are plenty of legitimate criticisms to level at the Foundation and this community for ineptness and inaction in these areas without making things up. On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Neotarf <neot...@gmail.com> wrote: > So we have two former arbitrators on this list, one of whom has offered to > assist in evaluating this thing privately, and who has himself signed such > a non-disparagement agreement, and another who wants to suppress all > discussion of it. We don't know if she has signed such an agreement. > > Publications like the New York Times and Washington Post do print and > evaluate information without naming sources, and it is true they are > sometimes called "fake news" on Twitter, but does not make the information > "factless", or prevent Wikipedia from consider them to be RS. > > On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Risker <risker...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> So, in other words, you have no evidence at all, except for some gossip, >> that *anyone* is being required to sign NDAs in order to edit Wikipedia. >> You have some information that suggests other organizations, completely >> separate from Wikipedia, >> >> It's bad enough that women do, indeed, face greater sexual harassment >> both societally and on Wikimedia projects, something that is quantified in >> various ways even if there is some question about the accuracy of that >> quantification. Sesnsationalistic statements such as yours, without any >> evidence at all, have a very significant negative impact on the ability to >> fight such harassment, especially when they seem so absurd. Simply put, >> it's factless allegation, or what certain sectors of the American public >> have come to term "fake news". Please retract your statement. >> >> Risker/Anne >> >> On 7 August 2017 at 08:21, Neotarf <neot...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I have no way of investigating something I was not supposed to find out >>> about in the first place. Given Wikipedia's culture of retaliation against >>> anyone who speaks out, I am unlikely to find out more, but it did seem >>> credible. These agreements are becoming more common, for instance here a >>> female employee wanted to get out of her non-disparagement agreement but >>> Angel List said no. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/0 >>> 7/21/technology/silicon-valley-sexual-harassment-non-dispara >>> gement-agreements.html Also the internal Google gender manifesto that >>> was just leaked "Until about a week ago, you would have heard very little >>> from me publicly about this, because (as a fairly senior Googler) my job >>> would have been to deal with it internally, and confidentiality rules would >>> have prevented me from saying much in public.But as it happens, (although >>> this wasn’t the way I was planning on announcing it) I actually recently >>> left Google..." https://medium.com/@yonatanzun >>> ger/so-about-this-googlers-manifesto-1e3773ed1788 >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 3:16 AM, Risker <risker...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 6 August 2017 at 23:08, Neotarf <neot...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> ...... >>>>> >>>>> Women who do not want to interact on these terms, with individuals who >>>>> are quite probably minors, are being silenced. I have heard that >>>>> professional women are being recruited for Wikipedia, women whose >>>>> employers >>>>> would ordinarily be expected to protect them from a 'hostile work place', >>>>> but they are being required to post their real identities on their talk >>>>> pages, along with the names of their employers. and a COI form statement. >>>>> They are also required to sign a non-disclosure agreement that prevents >>>>> them from revealing any harassment they experience in Wikipedia, or from >>>>> even revealing they have been required to sign an NDA. These women will >>>>> join Wikipedia, and listen to the pitch and eat the bagels, and Wikipedia >>>>> gets to count them as female editors, but very few of them go on to make >>>>> that second edit, because it's their professional reputation on the line. >>>>> >>>>> If Wikipedia wants women editors they are going to have to come to >>>>> terms with this. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> This is a very inflammatory thing to say, Neotarf, and I need to insist >>>> that you show some proof of this. Links to discussions or requirements, >>>> please. This is far too sensationalistic to allow it to sit here without >>>> serious evidence. >>>> >>>> Risker/Anne >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Gendergap mailing list >>>> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org >>>> To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, >>>> please visit: >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Gendergap mailing list >>> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org >>> To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please >>> visit: >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gendergap mailing list >> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org >> To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please >> visit: >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Gendergap mailing list > Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org > To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please > visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap >
_______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
