Hi, > Graphchi: Graphchi has an Apache License. The authors didn't mention the > license in the repository of graphchi-java(it is a wrapper of > Graphchi-cpp).
Just because Graphchi-cpp is Apache licensed doesn’t mean graphchi-java is or that people understand that they are contributing code under that licence. I’d reach out to teh project and ask them to add a license to their repository. > PageRank: we created an operator called PageRankOperator [9]; you can see > the use of WayangPlans#pageRankWithDictionaryCompression in [10]. However, > the PageRank will be converted depending on the optimiser's decision to one > of the implementations [11, 12,13, 14]. In the different implementations, > we implement the page rank algorithm following the API of the platform, or > we use an implementation of the platform. Does this > explanation address your question? Not really. It still looks like code has been copied form that page which is not under a compatible license. Copying code from Wikipedia or Stack Overflow can be problematic. > NOTICE: we include Apache Spark, Apache Flink, Apache Hadoop, Apache Giraph > and Graphchi-Java, because they contain dependencies that are transitive to > the Wayang code Only things that are included in the source release should be mentioned in NOTICE or LICENSE. Dependancies, especially transitive ones do not need to be mentioned. See [1] > and when wayang review the dependencies licenses [15], the > projects mentioned and their dependencies are excluded [16] Sorry I’m not sure what you mean by this. Thanks, Justin 1. https://infra.apache.org/licensing-howto.html#guiding --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
