Hi Craig,

Thanks for your detailed explanations.
I will be woring towards the improvement you suggested in the next releases.

Sincerely,
He

On 2023/06/01 04:57:57 Craig Russell wrote:
> Hi He,
> 
> I'd just like to emphasize that the mission of Apache is to create software, 
> which implies that creating releases is a primary goal. That's why we spend 
> so much effort on getting it right. A release is an act of the Foundation, 
> which is only possible if the PMC members vote on releases. (In the 
> incubator, only IPMC votes are binding) Votes need to be based on review of 
> release contents.
> 
> From your closing [RESULT][VOTE] message people might get the incorrect 
> understanding that only three people voted.
> 
> A few things that might improve your process in light of the importance of 
> reviewing and voting:
> 
> 1. When you call for a vote on the dev list, everyone who votes should tell 
> what they checked. I'd suggest adding a checklist as part of the vote email 
> for people to tell exactly what they reviewed. You can find many examples on 
> the general list.
> 
> 2. Once voting is done on the dev list, and there are no show-stopper issues, 
> you can summarize the voting. Many times, your mentors and PPMC members who 
> are also IPMC members will vote +1 and you might have three or more binding 
> +1 votes to be done.
> 
> 3. If you  still need more binding votes, you can explicitly ask your mentors 
> to vote before closing the vote on the dev list.
> 
> 4 .Once voting concludes on the dev list, you can summarize the vote on the 
> general incubator list and tell whether you have enough binding votes.
> 
> 5. Once you have at least three +1 binding votes (from IPMC members) you 
> should close the vote. As long as the release artifacts have not changed 
> since the dev list vote, your should include votes from the dev list voting 
> as well as the general list vote. In this case, it looks like the vote tally 
> would be:
> 
> Binding +1 votes:
> - Gordon
> - Felix Cheung
> - Wenli Zhang
> 
> Non-binding +1 votes:
> Pei Wang
> Yuan Zhuang
> Shaojun Wang
> 
> No other votes.
> 
> 6. I hope this will help everyone to understand that there was a vote on the 
> dev list and then another vote on the general list which resulted in a 
> successful vote to release.
> 
> Congratulations,
> Craig
> 
> > On May 31, 2023, at 18:57, He Sun <h...@apache.org> wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Craig,
> > 
> > It is an honor to receive your comments about Teaclave. I did not quit get 
> > you though. I would appreciate it if you could explain more about your 
> > concerns while other projects also have the same conditions you descirbed 
> > above.
> > 
> > According to my understanding about the Apache way, partly from 
> > https://incubator.apache.org/policy/incubation.html, the PPMC members and 
> > committers have to vote on Podling dev list. In our case, the vote thread 
> > is https://lists.apache.org/thread/nqzllmgqcozj5twg61wl085v3xo93pz2. Most 
> > of the commiters have subscribed the dev list and I will also remind them 
> > after a vote is started in different ways.
> > 
> > I am not one of the other committers, so I do not know why they do not vote 
> > again on incubator general list. Maybe some of them do not even subscribe 
> > the mail list.
> > 
> > Best,
> > He
> > 
> > On 2023/05/31 13:10:58 Craig Russell wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> 
> >> I'm a bit concerned that there are 19 PPMC members and six additional 
> >> committers and none of them voted on the release.
> >> 
> >> Voting on releases should be a regular exercise for all developers. Is 
> >> there some reason that only mentors voted?
> >> 
> >> Regards,
> >> Craig
> >> 
> >>> On May 30, 2023, at 20:20, He Sun <h...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> Hello everyone,
> >>> 
> >>> The vote has passed with 3 binding +1 votes. The vote PASSED with 3 
> >>> binding +1, 0 non-binding +1 and 0 -1 votes.
> >>> 
> >>> Binding +1 votes:
> >>> - Gordon
> >>> - Felix Cheung
> >>> - Wenli Zhang
> >>> 
> >>> Vote thread: 
> >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/5h8zd2chnj6bo262wx1sg6df0z1rsrgc
> >>> 
> >>> Thank you everyone for your feedback and help with this Teaclave release. 
> >>> I will be working on publishing the artifacts of Apache Teaclave 
> >>> (incubating) v0.5.1. 
> >>> 
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> He
> >>> 
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >>> 
> >> 
> >> Craig L Russell
> >> c...@apache.org
> >> 
> >> 
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >> 
> >> 
> > 
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > 
> 
> Craig L Russell
> c...@apache.org
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to