Em 04-07-2011 09:43, Guilhem Bonnefille escreveu:
2011/7/3 Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas<rr.ro...@gmail.com>:
Then, I would like to start a discussion of a feature I always missed in
Gitorious. That discussion is also in alignment with the recent concerns
about Gitorious versioning.
Mailing list are ineffective as an issue tracking system and Gitorious
definitely needs an issue tracking system.
Writing a good tracking system from scratch and integrating it to Gitorious
is too much work. That means it won't happen any time soon. It also means
more code to maintain.
Using an external issue-tracking system integrated to Gitorious, as the Ruby
language does with Redmine, seems to be the way to go for now.
Of course, external issue-tracking is probably the most simple
solution. But why not promoting more and more distributed model? I
know that many distributed issue tracking tools exist. Why not
selecting and integrating one with gitorious? This would give
gitorious many advantages over other solution.
Could you be more specific? Is there any specific tool you're talking
about. The ones I've seen cannot be compared to Redmine or Chiliproject
powerness...
What kind of benefits do you see in those distributed issue tracking
alternatives?
--
To post to this group, send email to gitorious@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
gitorious+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
