> On Nov 14, 2017, at 4:15 AM, Frank H. Ellenberger
> <frank.h.ellenber...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Am 11.11.2017 um 07:26 schrieb David T. via gnucash-devel:
>> Thomas,
>>
>> I am not an expert on any of this, but I think that referring to a “split”
>> as a “transaction line” ("ligne de transaction”) would be the most
>> appropriate.
>>
>> GnuCash uses the term “split” in a decidedly specific manner—which the Guide
>> takes pains to explain (cf. 2.2.3 and the Glossary, for example). I believe
>> that the "transaction line” terminology best reflects the underlying concept.
>
> David, can you check the guide so that always the first occurrence of
> the glossary entries in the text is linked to the glossary entry?
>
I’ll take it into consideration, although that task would not be something I
particularly enjoy.
>>
>> David T.
>>
>>> On Nov 11, 2017, at 4:08 AM, Christopher Lam <christopher....@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
