That sounds like program development. I only do documentation. 

> On Sep 14, 2018, at 3:37 PM, Adrien Monteleone 
> <adrien.montele...@lusfiber.net> wrote:
> 
> Since John indicated there is not an effort to adhere to the current Gnome 
> HIG, that statement should probably be removed. (as they don’t conform any 
> longer)
> 
> But there are a few places where I think they can be simplified, particularly 
> some items in the Actions menu should probably be moved to Tools.
> 
> Regards,
> Adrien
> 
>> On Sep 14, 2018, at 1:57 PM, David T. via gnucash-devel 
>> <gnucash-devel@gnucash.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> In the course of another arduous and lengthy thread, the question of the 
>> Gnome HIG came up. I attach the text in question below.
>> 
>> My question is whether the Guide needs changing at 1.2.1, where it says:
>> Easy to Use Menus: GnuCash menus conform to the GNOME Human Interface 
>> Guidelines. This means that they are simple and similar in appearance to 
>> many other GNOME applications. 
>> 
>> Is this statement inaccurate? Should it be removed?
>> 
>> David
>> 
>> ———— 
>> Previous discussion:
>> 
>> I don't know about allowing room for it, but it's pretty far in the future 
>> because we still have too many Gnome dependencies in the core and too many 
>> MVC violations to be able to implement a different toolkit.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> John Ralls
>> 
>> 
>>> On Sep 11, 2018, at 10:23 AM, Adrien Monteleone 
>>> <adrien.montele...@lusfiber.net <mailto:adrien.montele...@lusfiber.net>> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Then I misunderstood some earlier discussions about the UI, at least with 
>>> respect to Linux. What toolkit is envisioned to be used? What layout 
>>> principles? Or are those questions so far in the future as to not be worth 
>>> spending time allowing room for?
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Adrien
>>> 
>>>> On Sep 11, 2018, at 12:18 PM, John Ralls <jra...@ceridwen.us 
>>>> <mailto:jra...@ceridwen.us>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Sep 11, 2018, at 10:09 AM, Adrien Monteleone 
>>>>> <adrien.montele...@lusfiber.net <mailto:adrien.montele...@lusfiber.net>> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Sep 11, 2018, at 8:13 AM, David T. via gnucash-devel 
>>>>>> <gnucash-devel@gnucash.org <mailto:gnucash-devel@gnucash.org>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> In other words, unless there is a change in function, there is no need 
>>>>>> to change the functional description. It seems to me that putting text 
>>>>>> that doesn’t change into code is essentially a one-time process. Not 
>>>>>> necessarily easy, but once completed, not particularly obtrusive. 
>>>>>> Putting the functional description into code has the added benefit, 
>>>>>> perhaps, of alerting developers to the fact that if they change a 
>>>>>> feature, the description (right there in the code) needs an update as 
>>>>>> well.
>>>>> 
>>>>> While the principles might not change, or even the name/label of certain 
>>>>> buttons, the UI layout (where those buttons are, the fact that they are 
>>>>> buttons instead of menu entries, etc.) will very likely change as the 
>>>>> Gnome HIG is more faithfully implemented. But those code changes 
>>>>> shouldn’t affect anything generally in the Guide, and should auto update 
>>>>> the context help if it is drawn from the code itself. If not, then 
>>>>> consider that attempts to corral GnuCash within the confines of the Gnome 
>>>>> HIG, will produce such changes you’re thinking won’t happen.
>>>> 
>>>> Why do you think we're going to "more faithfully implement" the Gnome HIG? 
>>>> One of our long-term goals is to remove our Gnome dependencies. 
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> John Ralls
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> gnucash-devel mailing list
>> gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
>> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-devel mailing list
> gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel

_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel

Reply via email to