On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 07:33:23 -0400
Jameson Rollins <jroll...@finestructure.net> articulated:


> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 06:27:12 -0400, Jerry <gnupg.u...@seibercom.net>
> wrote:
> > I am assuming that you wanted me to reply to this message. Its
> > intended purpose was not overly clear. At least not to me, but then
> > again I have not had my second cup of coffee this morning.
> 
> I think if he had wanted you to respond to it he would have asked you
> to respond to it.

Perhaps, then again, perhaps not. As a lifelong sports official,
everything is considered legal unless specifically barred by a formal
rule.

In any case, I am not the only subscriber who replied to his post. I
was simply following the lead of other responders before me.

Which reminds me; there is a request at the end of every post I make.
Would it be to much of an imposition for you to honor that request?

-- 
Jerry
gnupg.u...@seibercom.net

Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__________________________________________________________________
People that are really very weird can get into sensitive positions and
have a tremendous impact on history.

        Dan Quayle
        US Republican politician (1947 - )

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Reply via email to