On 03/13/2011 10:57 AM, Jerry wrote: > On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 08:19:58 -0600 > Aaron Toponce <aaron.topo...@gmail.com> articulated: > >> On 03/13/2011 06:56 AM, Brad Rogers wrote: >>> On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 06:05:12 -0600 >>> Aaron Toponce <aaron.topo...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hello Aaron, >>> >>>> On 03/13/2011 05:42 AM, Jerry wrote: >>>>> Actually, it is a fine example of users/MUAs not correctly >>>>> formatting e-mail messages thereby forcing the use of a >>>>> deprecated method. >>>> [citation required] >>> >>> See the way Outlook Express treats PGP sigs, and the messages to >>> which they're attached. >> >> Are you implying that Outlook Express determines the support life >> cycle of OpenPGP standards? > > Outlook Express has been replaced by Windows Mail, an improved e‑mail > program with enhancements such as junk e‑mail filtering and protection > against phishing messages. >
I really don't want to get involved in this debate. The same one two weeks ago didn't change anyone's mind and this one won't either. But... Last time I tested, maybe a year ago, Windows Live Mail had the same weird behavior. It leads me to believe that it's just a re-branded version of outlook express. If we actually want to add some new content the MIME vs Inline debate this time, consider that the OP is blind and uses a screen reader. I've got a strong suspicion that PGP/Mime would play much more nicely with a screen reader or braille display than PGP/Inline. -- -Grant "Look around! Can you construct some sort of rudimentary lathe?"
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
