-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi
On Saturday 7 May 2011 at 10:21:17 PM, in <mid:banlktinacqcd+mz7fl1thlk55x2+u9g...@mail.gmail.com>, Jerome Baum wrote: > On digital signatures being legally binding, apparently > a scanned bitmap of your signature is enough to be > "binding" (as would be no signature), just that it > isn't very strong documentation. What is to stop that scanned bitmap of a person's signature being applied to a document the individual has no knowledge about? - -- Best regards MFPA mailto:expires2...@ymail.com What's another word for synonym? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQE7BAEBCgClBQJNxb6CnhSAAAAAAEAAVXNpZ25pbmdfa2V5X0lEIHNpZ25pbmdf a2V5X0ZpbmdlcnByaW50IEAgIE1hc3Rlcl9rZXlfRmluZ2VycHJpbnQgQThBOTBC OEVBRDBDNkU2OSBCQTIzOUI0NjgxRjFFRjk1MThFNkJENDY0NDdFQ0EwMyBAIEJB MjM5QjQ2ODFGMUVGOTUxOEU2QkQ0NjQ0N0VDQTAzAAoJEKipC46tDG5p5E0D/2Km Hd1UD7MJX7lATCE7mliY16m99P2R/KRpmaET1MhXTFCaxghXLKGgWgiOxeeaK1Zu yPCQPsDOfPF85ujuwdp2fnAFH6IcYi+NT+1DxtmUEVTozdAVpjgfkXFR9290EwE9 VrdqymFv4itu+51rYIc8cLs+na33pHbcn/yNuPYo =frVX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
