Hello Dirk, Am 02.11.18 um 15:20 schrieb Dirk Gottschalk via Gnupg-users: > You mean, you "tampered" with the file and the signature is still > valid? Are you sure? Then Adome does sometging really bad, IMHO. > > Such a signature should ensure that the file is unmodified completely. > otherwise somebody can modify it in a way that could be used as a > backdoor to the signature, at least in theory.
That is correct, that a signature is valid if there is added a timestamp AFTER sign the document. Very simplified it uses the same method for timestamping as for signing, and it is a kind of 2nd signature on the same document. the document is NOT altered or manipulated. regards Juergen -- Juergen M. Bruckner juer...@bruckner.tk
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
