On Thu, 06 Dec 2018 09:03:32 +0100, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Wed,  5 Dec 2018 19:56, stefan.cl...@posteo.de said:
> 
> > Well, my understanding would be that a least one (search) criteria
> > would be needed to fetch a key, right? And if so i could also
> > imagine  
> 
> Right, the fingerprint.  And maybe the long keyid for a transitional
> period because not all software already includes the fingerprint in
> the signature.

O.k.

> > that this one criteria could be abused as well, in form of a given
> > link to that resource, as long as it can be fetched via the web.  
> 
> Being able to search for a fingerprint does not allow you to search
> for the latest blockbuster movie to get a torrent link.  Thus there
> is no incentive to use the keyservers as an index and running a
> keyserver will be safer for most operators.

Well, i am not familiar how the current warez etc. scene works,
but my assumption was the following (o.k. i am no programmer...):

As long as we have the option to add additional UID's  to a key my
thinking was, after reading the links from Yegor, that one appends
arbitrary data to a key and provides a link, at some other place, to
that key, in the form of URL://keyserver/keyid_or_fp.

People then would only need a little program to dearmor and
extract the data from that key UID's.

Regards
Stefan

-- 
https://www.behance.net/futagoza
https://keybase.io/stefan_claas

Attachment: pgpaJFRDsGbGS.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Reply via email to