On Thu, 06 Dec 2018 11:42:32 +0100, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Thu,  6 Dec 2018 10:22, stefan.cl...@posteo.de said:
> 
> > As long as we have the option to add additional UID's  to a key my  
> 
> You can't add an UID to a key without having a signature from the
> primary key.  If the keyservers accept that any OpenPGP implementation
> will simply skip such an UID.

Understood. Please check this example, a key with with plenty of data,
which only needs to be extracted.

https://pgp.circl.lu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x73253A1F090C53B6

> > People then would only need a little program to dearmor and
> > extract the data from that key UID's.  
> 
> But they can't search for it on public servers.  Thus there is no gain
> here.  If you require a dedicated program anyway, that program can
> anyway consult one of the Tor hidden servers.  But no search engine
> will show it.

That's right, but my thought is / was someone can (ab)use key servers
as data storage / retrieval system and then only provides the key id
in a link.

Regards
Stefan

-- 
https://www.behance.net/futagoza
https://keybase.io/stefan_claas

Attachment: pgpkE2MhpQjUR.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Reply via email to