On 7/15/14, 1:09 PM, Ted Lemon wrote:
On Jul 15, 2014, at 3:55 PM, Michael Thomas <m...@mtcc.com> wrote:
What I'm trying to say is that DHCP as a way of advertising a service that will 
host my zone, or
in some way make my homenet names globally available is OK, but it should just 
be about
DISCOVERY and nothing else. All of the rest of the mechanisms between my CPE 
and some service
that causes my names to be globally available ought to use standard mechanisms 
which are not
in any way tied to topology.
Ah, yes.   Agreed, at least in theory.



Good. If that can be done at all, is there a reason that it cannot have those properties? That is if, say, my Google Nest spams my local homenet advertising the Google Eggs-in-one-basket DNS service, it should use the same set of protocols as a local ISP advertising over DHCP to
actually hook everything up between my CPE and their service.

Can we make this a *requirement*? If not, why not?

Mike

_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
homenet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to