>>> It seems to me that you are grasping for a use case to justify a split >>> where none is needed. Protocols like OSPF, IS-IS and Babel would all >>> work in both environments. RIP won't. So this seems more like an >>> argument not to use RIP than an argument to have two different homenet >>> router profiles. >> >> For the record, can you expound on the technical reason why RIP(v2) won't >> work? (I'm not a fan of it, but last time I used it was on SunOS 3 or >> something) > > hop count isn't a great tool for expressing that your gig-e port is a > more desireable path if up then the wifi interface. >
the cost/metric is perfectly fine for that. assuming a relatively small network diameter. cheers, Ole
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
