In message <ee14e538-18e9-440f-8edf-94c2b1a94...@fugue.com> Ted Lemon writes: > On Mar 7, 2015, at 10:44 AM, Juliusz Chroboczek > <j...@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> wrote: > > I think that you and Mikael expect that the ZigBee link will be designated > > as stub, while Brian, ever the pessimist, expects things to go wrong > > whenever they can. I happen to agree with Brian. > > We can't prevent people from doing stupid things, but we can at least > give good advice. I think the advice we would want to give is that a > router that has a zigbee interface SHOULD NOT advertise routes that > transit that link, although they SHOULD advertise routes _to_ that > link. I will admit that I am not exactly an expert on the topic, but > this doesn't seem like rocket science.
I agree. But ZigBee is not a link it is a low power bridged network, or at least it started out bridged. A ZigBee gateway is an application gateway running an RPC protocol based on SOAP. ZigBee IP seesm to be something new which embraces 6LoPAN and the ROLL WG's RPL and adds a ZigBee trademark to it. http://www.embedded.com/design/connectivity/4419558/Zigbee-s-new-IP-specification-for-IPv6-6LoPAN-wireless-network-designs http://www.embedded.com/electronics-news/4411167/Zigbee-releases-spec-for-IPv6-based-wireless-mesh-networks http://www.zigbee.org/zigbee-for-developers/network-specifications/zigbeeip/ Curtis _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
