> > Perhaps I could suggest something in the vein of "very important" or > > "much desired feature" > > This is not the notion that I tried to express, probably badly. It's not > necessarily the important feature, it's the one that will make people > implement and deploy the protocol stack in the first place.
Suggestion for '"killer feature" of Homenet': driver for using Homenet > > I found the term "bosses" leaving much to interpretation > > This happens to be deliberate. I am trying to avoid implying too much about > the organisational structure to which the reader belongs -- the "boss" here > could be the CIO, but it could be the leader of an Academic project, it could > be the supervisor of the intern who's implementing Homenet, or it could be > the Benevolent Dictator for Life of a Free Software project. > > If you find a sufficiently stately term that covers all of the above, I'll > take it. > (My thesaurus suggests "chieftain", but I tend to favour "foreman".) Suggestion for "our bosses": decision makers Which applies to all of the example people mentioned, but also spouses, significant others, and spoiled children -- who may be more relevant in the context of homenet. Barbara _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
